needhelp!
10-03 12:12 PM
bumpie
wallpaper portal 2 glados potato. portal
Decade_Alien
06-02 06:03 PM
let me be clear. I am with my employer now, 140 cleared and 485 pending. I am planning to move to a different company, but they are interested in paying me on 1099 basis. Just wondering if it is OK to work on 1099 or not? My current employer is not going withdraw i140 and my future employer will provide a Employment verification letter if needed. My only concern is can I work on 1099 or not?
Can your old company withdraw I140 once it is approved?
Can your old company withdraw I140 once it is approved?
WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC
08-09 08:39 AM
We need to stop calculations and start spreading the word for action items. One such out there is for filing I485 when PD is not current.
Pls spread the word among friends..
I agree with Vbkris77. Members please help people who are not able to file for 485.
IV wants to show USCIS that there are a lot of people who are suffering. We know that there are lot of people out there. Let us find them together.
.4 person from 1 already existing members will give us 10000 people who are waiting.
Pls spread the word among friends..
I agree with Vbkris77. Members please help people who are not able to file for 485.
IV wants to show USCIS that there are a lot of people who are suffering. We know that there are lot of people out there. Let us find them together.
.4 person from 1 already existing members will give us 10000 people who are waiting.
2011 portal 2 glados potato. portal
sss9i
12-06 02:01 AM
Phil not processing for ITIN anymore.
I called customer service, Everybody should send to Austin,TX
All,
Did you get a letter like this:
The reason for this notice is W7 is rejected or ITIN is revoked because our records indicate you have SSN now and use that instead of ITIN which stands cancelled.
Surprising is, i sent ssn/itin copies to Philadelphia, i got this letter from ITIN Austin office.
Please confirm.
Thanks
I called customer service, Everybody should send to Austin,TX
All,
Did you get a letter like this:
The reason for this notice is W7 is rejected or ITIN is revoked because our records indicate you have SSN now and use that instead of ITIN which stands cancelled.
Surprising is, i sent ssn/itin copies to Philadelphia, i got this letter from ITIN Austin office.
Please confirm.
Thanks
more...
nozerd
02-18 02:36 PM
Here goes this debate again.
Please dont compare USA and Canada. It is not fair. They are both totally different and both have their pros and cons.
An individual compares when they have a choice. So lets say Im buring a new car - I will compare Honda and Toyota. Or lets say Im in the mood to watch a movie I have choice between Hindi and English or I have choice between VCR, DVD, Theater.
In this case there is no choice. People want to move to Canada because they cant get US GC. Its basically like me going to a pure veg guy and asking him if he wasnts Masala Dosa or Mutton Biryani. By me telling the veg guy that mutton biryani is delicious whereas masala dosa is just so so doesnt really make much difference for him. There is really nothing to choose in this scenario.
Rather you should discuss life/standard of living in Canada v/s in home country. You have 3 choices.
1) Stay for next 5-10-15-20-xxx yrs in USA in hope of GC or favorable immig legislation.
2) Move to another country like Canada, Australia etc
3) Move back home.
If you have no issue with moving back home you shouldnt have an issue anyways.
Please dont compare USA and Canada. It is not fair. They are both totally different and both have their pros and cons.
An individual compares when they have a choice. So lets say Im buring a new car - I will compare Honda and Toyota. Or lets say Im in the mood to watch a movie I have choice between Hindi and English or I have choice between VCR, DVD, Theater.
In this case there is no choice. People want to move to Canada because they cant get US GC. Its basically like me going to a pure veg guy and asking him if he wasnts Masala Dosa or Mutton Biryani. By me telling the veg guy that mutton biryani is delicious whereas masala dosa is just so so doesnt really make much difference for him. There is really nothing to choose in this scenario.
Rather you should discuss life/standard of living in Canada v/s in home country. You have 3 choices.
1) Stay for next 5-10-15-20-xxx yrs in USA in hope of GC or favorable immig legislation.
2) Move to another country like Canada, Australia etc
3) Move back home.
If you have no issue with moving back home you shouldnt have an issue anyways.
minimalist
06-21 03:44 PM
Thanks desi3933. I was hoping that you would respond because you give the response based on corresponding laws, not on emotions/wishful thinking/moral judgements/many other things that cloud judgement.
Also all responses to this have been very balanced and I appreciate it and thank every one for that.
Also all responses to this have been very balanced and I appreciate it and thank every one for that.
more...
485Mbe4001
07-28 02:18 PM
hogwash, what a waste of taxpayers money. even before they start the hearings we know what the end result will be.. there will be a statement saying that ' american people want borders to be secured first..blah..blah..' rigged from the start.
they should just kill the damn bill and move on, why waste so much time and money..
they should just kill the damn bill and move on, why waste so much time and money..
2010 GLaDOS Potato (Portal 2) - a
go_guy123
02-19 10:27 AM
check the time zone analysis
I know I said compared to India. 12 hrs is the worst time difference.
UK Client BPO in India are far better off time wise than the US Client BPO
in india.
Plus China US flight time is also less. 10 - 11 hrs or so in direct flight.
India its around 20 - 24 hrs (except the few direct ones started recently)
The flight is very exhausting.
I know I said compared to India. 12 hrs is the worst time difference.
UK Client BPO in India are far better off time wise than the US Client BPO
in india.
Plus China US flight time is also less. 10 - 11 hrs or so in direct flight.
India its around 20 - 24 hrs (except the few direct ones started recently)
The flight is very exhausting.
more...
sertasheep
04-14 12:24 PM
ajm,
Here is an excerpt from a report I wrote on the USCIS. Its glad that there are several people who're thinking alike here. It may be a good idea for IV team to take a poll to see how many people are willing to pay a premium fee. That data could convince the USCIS to raise its fees, and be more effective.
QUOTE:
If the agency were to institute a premium processing fee for permanent visa processing, and even if at least 10% of the 130,000 applicants were to oblige, the agency could very well recover more than part of its operating expenses.
The graph above shows(not shown here) that if the application fees were to be increased one-time only to anywhere above USD 5817 per applicant for the current backlog, the USCIS would be able to generate enough revenue to sustain itself and not rely on federal budgets. Average costs in annual renewal of non-immigrant work permits are to the tune of $ 3,500 (mostly lawyer�s fees) on an average, and it is evident that applicants would be willing to pay an upfront fee to the USCIS rather than spend thousands of dollars every year in lawyers� fees.
Past instances of fee increases for other USCIS programs have proven successful. The graph below (not shown) shows an increase in the number of H1 visa applications for the premium processing option alone, after it was instituted in June 2001. Additionally, the US State Department (as well as Departments in other countries) is known to expedite passport processing for an additional fee.
UNQUOTE.
Note: If the fee is raised to USD 5817 or higher, the USCIS would be able to recover its administrative and operating costs of $ 756 million even if only 10% of applicants were to pay up.
See link http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/reports/INS/a0314/tables.htm#month for statistics on increase in H1 premium processing applications after it was instituted in June 01. The same logic can be applied to GCs.
Question is: How many people are willing to pay a premium?
Here is an excerpt from a report I wrote on the USCIS. Its glad that there are several people who're thinking alike here. It may be a good idea for IV team to take a poll to see how many people are willing to pay a premium fee. That data could convince the USCIS to raise its fees, and be more effective.
QUOTE:
If the agency were to institute a premium processing fee for permanent visa processing, and even if at least 10% of the 130,000 applicants were to oblige, the agency could very well recover more than part of its operating expenses.
The graph above shows(not shown here) that if the application fees were to be increased one-time only to anywhere above USD 5817 per applicant for the current backlog, the USCIS would be able to generate enough revenue to sustain itself and not rely on federal budgets. Average costs in annual renewal of non-immigrant work permits are to the tune of $ 3,500 (mostly lawyer�s fees) on an average, and it is evident that applicants would be willing to pay an upfront fee to the USCIS rather than spend thousands of dollars every year in lawyers� fees.
Past instances of fee increases for other USCIS programs have proven successful. The graph below (not shown) shows an increase in the number of H1 visa applications for the premium processing option alone, after it was instituted in June 2001. Additionally, the US State Department (as well as Departments in other countries) is known to expedite passport processing for an additional fee.
UNQUOTE.
Note: If the fee is raised to USD 5817 or higher, the USCIS would be able to recover its administrative and operating costs of $ 756 million even if only 10% of applicants were to pay up.
See link http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/reports/INS/a0314/tables.htm#month for statistics on increase in H1 premium processing applications after it was instituted in June 01. The same logic can be applied to GCs.
Question is: How many people are willing to pay a premium?
hair GLaDOS Potato Wiki
txh1b
04-30 02:42 PM
Dude, Any place in the US is better than arm-pit state NJ. It can only get better.
LOL!! I too have a phobia for NJ.
LOL!! I too have a phobia for NJ.
more...
pointlesswait
07-19 01:05 PM
why do they need W2's and Paystub????
Also does everyone have interview @ 485 stage>>>>
Also does everyone have interview @ 485 stage>>>>
hot portal 2 glados as potato.
gc28262
06-19 07:12 PM
When you write your answer or question please always add that it is your assumption or its your understanding on this point.
I read many forums and did lot of Google search on background cases and talked to attorney. Every one says that USCIS never give specific detail of background check and congressman never helps in background check.
I communicated congressman and got same result as I read in different forums.
Thanks.
I have read in other forums where people got response from congressman that it is pending background check. Of course USCIS won't give out the specific details as they are not responsible for background check. When a congressman does an inquiry they have to reveal why it is pending.
Again I am not a legal specialist/lawyer ! My response is based on information gathered from other forums.
I read many forums and did lot of Google search on background cases and talked to attorney. Every one says that USCIS never give specific detail of background check and congressman never helps in background check.
I communicated congressman and got same result as I read in different forums.
Thanks.
I have read in other forums where people got response from congressman that it is pending background check. Of course USCIS won't give out the specific details as they are not responsible for background check. When a congressman does an inquiry they have to reveal why it is pending.
Again I am not a legal specialist/lawyer ! My response is based on information gathered from other forums.
more...
house portal 2 glados.
senthil1
07-17 09:00 PM
It may retrogess but when they open on Oct they have to set some Cut off date. For example if cut off date is Dec 2004 then you will be able to file.
I will tell a comparision with example. You are not filing now. A person P1 with PD of Jan 2006 and P2 of Jan 2005 is filing now. And on oct 2007 they will put cut off date of Feb 2005. We assume by the time oct 2007 Finger print is cleared by P1 and P2. Then you are filing I485 on oct 2007. P2 will get GC as he cleared FP. On nov 2007 if PD goes back to oct 2004 or earlier your application will struck till your PD becomes current. This is one of bad situation you can expect
Other is to make the PD current it may take years for next time. This is unlikely as you are in EB2 unless so many substitution labors are done before your PD. But when the persons before your PD(those who are filing) are getting gc atleast you can be able to file I485 if you miss this time.
Thanks for all replys.
So my understanding is,
If I dont file now, even though my priority date is Nov, 2004 under EB2 category, there is possibility that the dates will retrogress so badly and USCIS will not accept any more I-485 for years down the line.
If my understanding is correct, I will file now.
Really appreciate your help.
MSR
I will tell a comparision with example. You are not filing now. A person P1 with PD of Jan 2006 and P2 of Jan 2005 is filing now. And on oct 2007 they will put cut off date of Feb 2005. We assume by the time oct 2007 Finger print is cleared by P1 and P2. Then you are filing I485 on oct 2007. P2 will get GC as he cleared FP. On nov 2007 if PD goes back to oct 2004 or earlier your application will struck till your PD becomes current. This is one of bad situation you can expect
Other is to make the PD current it may take years for next time. This is unlikely as you are in EB2 unless so many substitution labors are done before your PD. But when the persons before your PD(those who are filing) are getting gc atleast you can be able to file I485 if you miss this time.
Thanks for all replys.
So my understanding is,
If I dont file now, even though my priority date is Nov, 2004 under EB2 category, there is possibility that the dates will retrogress so badly and USCIS will not accept any more I-485 for years down the line.
If my understanding is correct, I will file now.
Really appreciate your help.
MSR
tattoo portal 2 glados potato.
gc_check
10-05 05:14 PM
I received ANOTHER finger printing notice just for me saying "The FBI was unable process your finger print card. In order for the USCIS to continue processing your application, it will be necessary to have your prints retaken."
Is there a way I can ensure that this time it gets done correctly? Bunch of idiots we have working at the USCIS local offices!! I gave my first set of prints on Sep 25th and already there is a problem!
Has anyone been in the same boat before?
Have heard this before, A friend of mine, had to take FP atleast 3 times, before she got her card, Reason her hands were too soft/plain and the finger prints were not captured correctly for analysis.
Is there a way I can ensure that this time it gets done correctly? Bunch of idiots we have working at the USCIS local offices!! I gave my first set of prints on Sep 25th and already there is a problem!
Has anyone been in the same boat before?
Have heard this before, A friend of mine, had to take FP atleast 3 times, before she got her card, Reason her hands were too soft/plain and the finger prints were not captured correctly for analysis.
more...
pictures portal 2 glados potato. portal
Humhongekamyab
05-07 12:07 PM
Yes it appear that it might be true. Couple of my friends whose 485's were filed in 2007 have received RFE's. My PD is 2005 but the 485 was filed in August 2008 - I have NOT seen any indication on the US CIS website that anybody has touched my file - not even a soft LUD.
dresses portal 2 glados potato. portal
khmo
06-22 12:02 PM
Thanks Ruben. I appreciate for your reply. My Employer is experiencing delays in other I140 cases also. My company agreed to sign G28 and attorney did AILA enquiry and got detailed but standard reply. It basically says that USICS is doing detail background check on your case. Please contact after 6 months.
Later I found the same reply posted by other users on different forums. My attorney also told me most provably this background check is for company. He cannot get any specific detail from USICS.
Can you please suggest me what are the option I have now. I already completed 9 years on H1B. Can I get H1B transfer to other company based on my 2 year old pending I140 and I485? If yes then can I also port my pending I140 to new company? Please reply.
Thanks.
Below is AILA enquiry response that I got from attorney:
“USCIS is committed to adjudicating immigration benefits in a timely, efficient manner that ensures public safety and national security.
Toward that end, USCIS requires extensive background checks for every application or petition it adjudicates. While background checks for most applications or petitions are completed quickly, a small percentage of cases involve unresolved background check issues that result in adjudication delays.
Background checks involve more than just the initial submission of and response related to biographical information and fingerprints. When checks and/or a review of an administrative record reveal an issue potentially impacting an applicant’s eligibility for the requested immigration benefit, further inquiry is needed. The inquiry may include an additional interview and/or the need to contact another agency for updates or more comprehensive information. If it is determined that an outside agency possesses relevant information about a case, USCIS requests such information for review. Upon gathering and assessing all available information, USCIS then adjudicate the application as expeditiously as possible.
We have checked in your constituent’s case and have been assured that the agency is aware of your inquiry, and is monitoring progress related to it. However, unresolved issues in your constituent’s case require thorough review before a decision can be rendered. Unfortunately, we cannot speculate as to when this review process will be completed.
We realize that your constituent may feel frustrated by delays related to his or her case. As an agency, we must weigh individual inconvenience against the broader concerns of public safety and national security.
We hope this information and assurance are helpful. It we may be of assistance in the future, please let us know. “
Every one assume that the background check is on Company???
Does Congress man make an inquiry on your behalf or your employers behalf???
Later I found the same reply posted by other users on different forums. My attorney also told me most provably this background check is for company. He cannot get any specific detail from USICS.
Can you please suggest me what are the option I have now. I already completed 9 years on H1B. Can I get H1B transfer to other company based on my 2 year old pending I140 and I485? If yes then can I also port my pending I140 to new company? Please reply.
Thanks.
Below is AILA enquiry response that I got from attorney:
“USCIS is committed to adjudicating immigration benefits in a timely, efficient manner that ensures public safety and national security.
Toward that end, USCIS requires extensive background checks for every application or petition it adjudicates. While background checks for most applications or petitions are completed quickly, a small percentage of cases involve unresolved background check issues that result in adjudication delays.
Background checks involve more than just the initial submission of and response related to biographical information and fingerprints. When checks and/or a review of an administrative record reveal an issue potentially impacting an applicant’s eligibility for the requested immigration benefit, further inquiry is needed. The inquiry may include an additional interview and/or the need to contact another agency for updates or more comprehensive information. If it is determined that an outside agency possesses relevant information about a case, USCIS requests such information for review. Upon gathering and assessing all available information, USCIS then adjudicate the application as expeditiously as possible.
We have checked in your constituent’s case and have been assured that the agency is aware of your inquiry, and is monitoring progress related to it. However, unresolved issues in your constituent’s case require thorough review before a decision can be rendered. Unfortunately, we cannot speculate as to when this review process will be completed.
We realize that your constituent may feel frustrated by delays related to his or her case. As an agency, we must weigh individual inconvenience against the broader concerns of public safety and national security.
We hope this information and assurance are helpful. It we may be of assistance in the future, please let us know. “
Every one assume that the background check is on Company???
Does Congress man make an inquiry on your behalf or your employers behalf???
more...
makeup portal 2 glados potato. portal
gcdreamer05
03-23 01:17 PM
I have tax guy who was from Bangladesh and then I moved to an Indian guy who did taxes for me this year. Both of them told me that I can not benefit by the fact that I am making payments in India for a property I bought............so I would think that the above statement is incorrect.
Gcdreamer05- Can you please tell us what rule/guideline IRS has where we can take advantage of home loan in India? If there is something like that a lot of people will get the advantage.
piyu it is defintely possible, i am not a CPA and hence do not know what rule/guideline but i can give you links to say it is possible,
look at this
http://www.taxinfoblog.com/2008/06/itemized-deduct.html
and look at this
http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion:Foreign_mortgage_interest_deduction
You need to be very careful as it will trigger IRS audit so you need to make sure you consult a very good tax consultant and have all the required docs ready for you to do it.
But it is defintely possible if you play by rules. Consult an experienced Tax consultant.
Gcdreamer05- Can you please tell us what rule/guideline IRS has where we can take advantage of home loan in India? If there is something like that a lot of people will get the advantage.
piyu it is defintely possible, i am not a CPA and hence do not know what rule/guideline but i can give you links to say it is possible,
look at this
http://www.taxinfoblog.com/2008/06/itemized-deduct.html
and look at this
http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion:Foreign_mortgage_interest_deduction
You need to be very careful as it will trigger IRS audit so you need to make sure you consult a very good tax consultant and have all the required docs ready for you to do it.
But it is defintely possible if you play by rules. Consult an experienced Tax consultant.
girlfriend portal 2 glados potato.
Macaca
06-20 08:19 PM
There have been many articles (posted in News Article Thread) that claim that grassroot emails, faxes, phone calls, blogs, radio talk shows were a huge reason for the CIR's death. The following are excerpts from some articles.
Grass Roots Roared and Immigration Plan Collapsed By JULIA PRESTON New York Times, June 10, 2007: part1 (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=80626&postcount=203) & part 2 (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=80627&postcount=204)
“Technologically enhanced grass-roots activism is what turned this around, people empowered by the Internet and talk radio,” said Colin A. Hanna, president of Let Freedom Ring, a conservative group.
Mr. Hanna suggested the passion and commitment were on the side of the opponents.
“The opposition to the amnesty plan is so much more intense than the intensity of the supporters,” said Mr. Hanna, speaking of the bill’s provisions to grant legal status to qualifying illegal immigrants, which the authors of the legislation insisted was not amnesty.
In the end, supporters conceded that they were outmaneuvered by opponents who boiled down their complaints to that single hot-button word, repeated often and viscerally on talk radio programs and blogs.
Conservative bloggers in full revolt over immigration (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=85892&postcount=379) By Peter Hamby CNN Washington Bureau, June 15, 2007
Blogs and anti-immigration organizations used the Web to tap into the growing discontent over the immigration bill, using the Internet to organize phone and fax campaigns to urge senators to vote against the bill. It was a plugged-in show of force that would have been beyond comprehension a decade ago.
"The support for this issue has always been there, but the Internet is the platform the issue has needed to become a force in American politics," said David All, a Republican online strategist based in Washington.
Programmer Guild is an anti H1B + EB GC organization with the sole purpose of blogging anti H1B rhetoric. I have not found their blogs convincing. I have blogged against them and they shut up eventually.
Programmer Guild's youtube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU) was posted yesterday in Programmers guild 's new propaganda (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5317&highlight=Guild). Also posted in this thread is an InformationWeek Article (http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199905192) on this youtube posting. I think Streaker (= Colleen) is a Guild person who is the first to blog in this article and in many other articles I have read.
I don't know the details of the PERM issue involved but I don't think Guild's attack is convincing. Also, the blog has introduced the issue of Durbin/Grassley sending letter to Indian companies. There was a thread NASSCOM's reply to Senator Durbin and Grassley's letter to Indian IT companies (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4905&highlight=NASSCOM) in which Indians claimed that the companies gave a very strong response to Durbin/Grassley. I did not follow that story.
So far this blog is all Guild.
IV members can not send emails (lawmakers + reporters), IV members can not call lawmakers, IV members can not blog, IV members can not fax. What is a reason to beleive that we can have any favorable bill in the future?
Grass Roots Roared and Immigration Plan Collapsed By JULIA PRESTON New York Times, June 10, 2007: part1 (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=80626&postcount=203) & part 2 (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=80627&postcount=204)
“Technologically enhanced grass-roots activism is what turned this around, people empowered by the Internet and talk radio,” said Colin A. Hanna, president of Let Freedom Ring, a conservative group.
Mr. Hanna suggested the passion and commitment were on the side of the opponents.
“The opposition to the amnesty plan is so much more intense than the intensity of the supporters,” said Mr. Hanna, speaking of the bill’s provisions to grant legal status to qualifying illegal immigrants, which the authors of the legislation insisted was not amnesty.
In the end, supporters conceded that they were outmaneuvered by opponents who boiled down their complaints to that single hot-button word, repeated often and viscerally on talk radio programs and blogs.
Conservative bloggers in full revolt over immigration (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=85892&postcount=379) By Peter Hamby CNN Washington Bureau, June 15, 2007
Blogs and anti-immigration organizations used the Web to tap into the growing discontent over the immigration bill, using the Internet to organize phone and fax campaigns to urge senators to vote against the bill. It was a plugged-in show of force that would have been beyond comprehension a decade ago.
"The support for this issue has always been there, but the Internet is the platform the issue has needed to become a force in American politics," said David All, a Republican online strategist based in Washington.
Programmer Guild is an anti H1B + EB GC organization with the sole purpose of blogging anti H1B rhetoric. I have not found their blogs convincing. I have blogged against them and they shut up eventually.
Programmer Guild's youtube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU) was posted yesterday in Programmers guild 's new propaganda (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5317&highlight=Guild). Also posted in this thread is an InformationWeek Article (http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199905192) on this youtube posting. I think Streaker (= Colleen) is a Guild person who is the first to blog in this article and in many other articles I have read.
I don't know the details of the PERM issue involved but I don't think Guild's attack is convincing. Also, the blog has introduced the issue of Durbin/Grassley sending letter to Indian companies. There was a thread NASSCOM's reply to Senator Durbin and Grassley's letter to Indian IT companies (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4905&highlight=NASSCOM) in which Indians claimed that the companies gave a very strong response to Durbin/Grassley. I did not follow that story.
So far this blog is all Guild.
IV members can not send emails (lawmakers + reporters), IV members can not call lawmakers, IV members can not blog, IV members can not fax. What is a reason to beleive that we can have any favorable bill in the future?
hairstyles GLaDOS: No tricks. This potato
CaliHoneB
05-05 02:21 PM
Hi Guys,
I think some of the folks seem to agree that this is a good idea but are pessimistic about this becoming reality..I say we should be little more optimistic here..if a congressman thought of having a provision for premium processing for I485 I believe there is hope..I know AILA may not support it but who cares..and why should we care they are here to help us facilitate not to hinder our path to GC..I believe IV foundation it self is based on immigrants trying to help them selves ( .. enough of bhashan) so we should keep this thread alive and ask more people to support this initiative..
Cheers
I think some of the folks seem to agree that this is a good idea but are pessimistic about this becoming reality..I say we should be little more optimistic here..if a congressman thought of having a provision for premium processing for I485 I believe there is hope..I know AILA may not support it but who cares..and why should we care they are here to help us facilitate not to hinder our path to GC..I believe IV foundation it self is based on immigrants trying to help them selves ( .. enough of bhashan) so we should keep this thread alive and ask more people to support this initiative..
Cheers
WillIBLucky
12-13 06:43 PM
Guys/Gals,
I think we should let his office relax and not call and disturb. It might be better idea to send e-mails and not calling. If we all start to call him it will like last Thursday and Friday that we did for Senator Sessions.
They are taking a break and enjoying with family so e-mail would be a better option now and in January when he is back in Senate we could call wish him a very good new year and request to take up the bill again.
I think we should let his office relax and not call and disturb. It might be better idea to send e-mails and not calling. If we all start to call him it will like last Thursday and Friday that we did for Senator Sessions.
They are taking a break and enjoying with family so e-mail would be a better option now and in January when he is back in Senate we could call wish him a very good new year and request to take up the bill again.
bb20078
10-15 04:45 PM
filed 1-485 NSC 19th july. i-140 approved earlier this year
ND 17 sep
EAD received 6 oct
FP notice received 15 Oct
ND 17 sep
EAD received 6 oct
FP notice received 15 Oct
